Home » Marketing

Go Make Friends With A Scientist

18 May 2009 9 Comments

Next time you take the rubbish out at work make sure you stop at the leaking wooden cellar door. Jar it open. Stoop down and pop your head in. Watch the cobwebs. See that gut in the far, dark corner with the hunched back and uncontrollable twitch who’s making intermittent yelping noises? That’s your scientist. Or in marketing terms, your research and developer. Go make friends with them. You might need them soon.

In the past, these guys haven’t received too much attention. They made stuff. People bought it. And they moved on to the next product. But now you need to know what they know. Why? Because your customers will. And you’re going to face the barrage.

As marketers, we hang to absolutely every fact and opportunity in order to gain competitive advantage. No matter how small the detail is, we can usually manipulate it to be of a substantial product benefit for our consumers. However, as competition increases these manipulations tend to be magnified even more. But do we really understand these benefits and how true they are? Of course not, we just take the R&D guys word for it.

You can’t tell me that the marketing team at All-Bran really understand what Thiamin, Riboflavin or Niacin actually does – they just know that All-Bran helps you poop better. But mentioning these ingredients provides unchallenged justification. This is the same for Garnier Nutritionist which claims it is the Omega 3+6 and magnesium which “stimulate the skin”. Do they really know? They don’t but their R&D guys do.

But what happens when that tedious link gets broken by the curious customer? Your product falls to pieces in an instant. And with the power that consumers have today, it will literally be in one instant. Remember the story of Ribena? Two New Zealand school students found that the drink had no detectable Vitamin C content when the advertising hung its hat on having “four times the Vitamin C of oranges”. They were fined, forced to apologised and start a new campaign (not to sell product but to regain trust). This was world wide news in an instant – all from a school science experiment. While we’re here let’s not forget about Dell laptop batteries or that little toxic toy called Bindeez. A scientific friend would have been very handy here.  

It’s not always in defence that you need your R&D guy on your side. A great example of using it for good is the relaunch of Mother energy drink. The initial flop wasn’t from the marketing campaign. Conversations spread like wildfire through online social networks about the horrible taste of the product and it became the butt of many jokes. The mob decided that the taste could not be tolerated. After taking it back to development they came up with a new formula which regained the trust of its target and is now one of the leaders in the energy drink category.

So, while we as marketers understand (or should understand) the motivations and desires of our consumers, it is just as important to understand the product to the most minute detail. But it’s not a one way street. As we step into the the monitoring of online word of mouth, marketers are becoming of greater value to developers. Those listening to the consumers are at the forefront of the continually changing trends occurring in the marketplace. These need to be relayed to the R&D team.

It makes sense for marketers and R&D to be tight buddies. So go on, go drag your scientist out of his den and into the tooth whitening shine of the marketing department.

Photo courtesy of Okko Pyykko

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Red Bull’s Size Issues
  2. Getting To Fourth Base In Social Media Relationships

9 Comments »

  • nextbrett said:

    Hey Nathan,

    Too true – marketing can’t exist in a vacuum, and “guaranteed not to turn pink in the can” is not so easy any more.

    I can see a not too far away future where communications, technology and science are all part of the same team. You see the lines blurring with social media and gone are the days of IT being solely in charge of the web development.

    However, I also have a gripe with pseudo-scientific claims that denigrate the hard work those pesky scientists in the corner do. For Example, I suspect, magnesium and omega “stimulating the skin…”

    Great Pic!

  • Kate Kendall said:

    Eureka! I’ve got this one solved… become a scientist and a marketer. ;-) Think I must be the only one in the world and what a hot combination it is.

    My majors were microbiology and biotecnology though.

    Kate

  • Kate Kendall said:

    ^ Biotechnology. (Doesn’t let you edit comments). :-)

  • Nathan Bush said:

    @brett great points – especially about IT. Marketers are expected to knows the ins and outs of what is technically possible to frame their initiatives.

    @Kate – that’s brilliant, you can just have the crazy conversations in your own head. I think you’ve got a massive headstart here as the ‘marketing scientist’ or is it the ‘scientific marketer’. The voices in your head start… NOW!

  • returnon said:

    Perhaps certain companies should actively involve their R&D in social media? J&J could address mother's questions about Band Aids in blogs and tweets.

    Someone like Kate would be perfect to facilitate dialogue for a pharma or medical company, having a grasp of their core business. I also come from a biochemistry background, all but abandoned for film production.

    Love to know if anyone else has had better experiences, but my dealings with pharmas haven't been easy. For companies working with very advanced technology, they're pretty behind when it comes to the sort of new communications mediums that would help them spread their message. Particularly in fostering dialogue with doctors, their most important relationship.

  • Tim Burrowes - Mumbrella said:

    I used to go out with someone who worked in the marketing department at P&G.

    She had a similar dual qualification – I was never entirely sure if she was a scientist doing marketing, or a marketer who'd geeked up.

    I'm pretty sure her scientist half was embarrassed by the large salary her marketer half earned though.

  • Kate Kendall said:

    @Tim, well I’ve shot myself in the foot then, living the lavish ‘editorial’ life. Cough cough. Donate money here. :-P

  • Nathan Bush said:

    @returnon I absolutely agree with you. And I think it is a barrier to ‘technical’ brands getting involved with social media. What happens if a conversation starts which requires some actual information (not marketing jargon). Where will we turn?

    @Tim @Kate maybe we can set up a funf for ‘confused marketers’?

  • Nathan Bush said:

    @Tim @Kate sorry that should have been fund not funf. The fund for bloggers who can’t spell good will follow.

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes